« January 2005 | Main | March 2005 »
February 23, 2005
Calling A Spade a Spade...Outing Islam and that Madman Muhammed
Is anyone else sick of having to be told everyday that islam is okay and it's all about peace and love, despite the fact that a new terrorist plot is discovered everyday, or a new terrorist plot occurs, or another person is arrested for trying to blow someone or something up, and the funny thing is- hey, looky there little Billy, every single one of these men and women are muslim. I mean, come on- it's been quite some time since I have seen a non-muslim reported about on TV for plotting to kill someone in the name of the great (and imaginary allah.) The trouble in the world right now- well, the major part of it, comes from- ding ding ding, muslims! Muslims terrorists, muslim terrorist cells, muslim countries (Iran, Saudi Arabia, Syria to name a few!) Countries that jail their citizens for decades for disagreeing with the government, countries that force women to cover every single part of their body or face possible death, countries that officially have a hate for the jewish people. Let's call it what it is- islam is a religion of warped mentality and warfare, of hate and of discrimination.
Let's take the ol' founding father of islam himself- muhammed (yes yes, blessed be his holy name, I know, I know). This guy was a murderer, a warrior who slaughtered many, a liar, almost surely a child rapist, and more. Wake up call, it would make more sense to follow Charles Manson, and let me tell you- the followers of Charles Manson were labeled nutso and sent to prison for a very very long time. There were no cries of tolerance for Manson's gang! Yet, we hear this unending call to tolerate islam and that it is truly a religion of peace and love, one of the great religions alongside Christianity. Nope, sorry, Jesus never killed anyone, nor did he ever lie to anyone, and he surely had no sexual relations with anyone, especially not young girls! So, let's stop claiming that the two religions "respect" the same people and the same values, because they do not. When the top of your religious foodchain is a madman, and your entire religion is based on the insane rantings of said madman, let's face it- you're screwed before even getting out of the gate. So, let's all of us speak the truth for once, and stop this PC bullshit- muhammed was insane, and so is islam. Now, if we can get the masses in whackoland (aka, the middle east) to accept these facts, we might have some hope left!
Posted by Josh at 01:35 AM | Comments (4)
February 22, 2005
More Evidence that Doug Wead is Full of It
Further evidence that Doug Wead is a weasel and an embarassment to historians and authors (and humans) everywhere...
from newsmax.com:
Monday, Feb. 21, 2005 1:33 p.m. EST
Wead: Unreleased Tapes a 'Betrayal'
Audiotapes released Sunday of President Bush speaking in a private, off-the-record conversation may not be as damaging as critics had hoped, with Bush winning raves in some cases for sounding the same in unguarded moments as he does in public.
But presidential historian and former first family friend Doug Wead, who secretly recorded Bush, is hinting that the full nine hours of audio he has could be a different matter.
Asked whether the president would view his release of the audio as an act of treachery from a trusted friend, Wead told the Washington Post on Monday, "It depends on what else is on the tapes."
Then Wead implied that the unreleased material could be embarrassing, explaining, "Ninety percent of the tapes have not been heard. He can see that my motive was not to try to hurt him."
How could Bush see that, unless Wead was holding back damaging clips?
"If I released all the tapes, it would be an act of betrayal," the author told the Post, further indicating he has some explosive material.
But in the next breath Wead promised: "Most of them have never seen the light of day and never will."
That's not, however, what he told the New York Times for its front page story on Sunday, explaining that he wanted to release them when he died in order to leave the nation a unique record of Mr. Bush.
Other aspects of Wead's story are also raising concerns. He told the Times, for instance, that his motive in releasing some of his tapes had nothing to do with the fact that he has a new book to publicize.
However, the Post reports that Wead's publisher was deeply involved in making the tapes public.
"He said that he had never intended the tapes to become public, but that his publisher, Simon & Schuster, asked to hear them for libel reasons," reports the Post.
The Post continued, "He said after he played them for his editors, he was contacted by the Times and agreed to play portions for a reporter."
Why was the Times alerted? And why did Wead agree to help the paper if he never intended to make the tapes public?
At this point, there's only one logical answer: Mr. Wead's earlier plan to hide his tapes forever changed radically once his publisher began to see dollar signs.
Posted by Josh at 09:59 PM | Comments (0)
Doug Wead and His Obvious Lies
If you ask me, this Doug Wead guy is a loser. He secretly tapes candid conversations with President Bush while he was till governor of Texas, then he uses the tapes to write a book he claims is about raising a president- some book about the childhoods of presidents. He says he never meant for the tapes to go public, yet he admits he let a New York Times reporter listen to a dozen of the tapes. (The NY Times, one of the most liberal papers in the country!) Of course, The Times have come out to attack Bush by using the tapes, trying to twist some of his answers to imply he used marijuana and cocaine.
Wead claims he's a friend of Bush, but friends don't secretly tape private conversations and use them in books, nor do they release said tapes to the NY Times then claim that he never meant for any of it to become public. This guy is a grade A loser in my book.
Posted by Josh at 09:53 PM | Comments (0)
February 17, 2005
Hypocritical Screamin' Dean Demands Apology
It's okay for Howard 'screaming' Dean to say he hates Republicans and everything they stand for (smaller government, lower taxes, personal responsibility, a strong military- gosh, who wouldn't hate all those things?)...yet he's calling for an apology from the NY republican party head for statements that were completely accurate. Last time I checked, Boxer is a democrat, Dean is a democrat, and I certainly believe that Stewart is a democrat as well. So, the guy stated a simple fact, but Dean wants an apology? This from the man who just said he hates republicans and everything they stand for?!
Yes, Howard Dean is out of his mind, and this alone proves it...
------------------
from a larger AP story:
Meanwhile Wednesday, Dean called on the head of New York's Republican Party to apologize or resign over remarks linking the Democrats to a civil rights lawyer convicted of aiding terrorists.
Dean called Stephen Minarik's comments offensive and said, "The American people deserve better than this type of political character assassination."
On Monday, Minarik said that Dean's election shows that "the Democrats simply have refused to learn the lessons of the past two election cycles, and now they can be accurately called the party of Barbara Boxer, Lynne Stewart and Howard Dean."
Stewart is a New York City lawyer convicted last week of helping terrorists by smuggling messages from one of her imprisoned clients, a radical Egyptian sheik, to his terrorist disciples on the outside. Boxer is a Democratic senator from California.
Among Minarik's critics is Republican New York Gov. George Pataki, who said Tuesday that his remark was not "within the realm of appropriate political discourse."
Minarik issued a statement Wednesday saying "it is not the Republican Party's problem that these far-left activists have made their home in the Democratic party."
Posted by Josh at 05:52 PM | Comments (0)
CBS Nonsense
CBS News. Not biased. Not at all. Nevvvvver.
I stumbled upon this story of supposed Bush flipflops...too bad most of them I read thru are total nonsense. They point out Bush said we found bio weapons labs in Iraq (we did), then they say he flipflopped by saying we didn't find stockpiles of WMD. STOCKPILES- key word there, folks. We DID find wmd, but we didn't find STOCKPILES of WMD (yet)- anyone with reason knows he buried them in the sand like he did with the 30 or so russian MIGs the US military found, and some of it had to have been shipped off to state supporter of terrorism, Syria!
To the geniuses at CBS news- finding weapons but not finding STOCKPILES of weapons equals a flipfop. Absurd...
I will totally rip to shreds CBS' piece later...
----------------------
UPDATE:
I said I would refute CBS' nonsense, and here we go...just gonna take a few of these, because it's late.
CBS SAYS:
Nation Building and the War in Iraq
During the 2000 campaign, George W. Bush argued against nation building and foreign military entanglements. In the second presidential debate, he said: "I'm not so sure the role of the United States is to go around the world and say, 'This is the way it's got to be.'"
The United States is currently involved in nation building in Iraq on a scale unseen since the years immediately following World War II.
During the 2000 election, Mr. Bush called for U.S. troops to be withdrawn from the NATO peacekeeping mission in the Balkans. His administration now cites such missions as an example of how America must "stay the course."
--------------------------
I SAY:
This is a ridiculous claim I am tired of hearing. The world changed after Sept 11, 2001. What Bush said about nation building and being against it in 2000 is to be ignored...considering that little terrorist attack. CBS remembers that day right? The people jumping from windows 100 stories up...innocent men and women being burned alive, airline passengers being turned into dust. CBS does recall all of these events, right? With the new world we live in, nation building is NOW important. To force brutal regimes out and replace them with governments who will no longer support terrorism, but do all they can to stop it.
CBS SAYS:
Iraq and the Sept. 11 Attacks
In a press conference in September 2002, six months before the invasion of Iraq, President Bush said, “you can't distinguish between al Qaeda and Saddam when you talk about the war on terror... they're both equally as bad, and equally as evil, and equally as destructive.”
In September of 2004, Mr. Bush said: “We've had no evidence that Saddam Hussein was involved with September 11th." Though he added that “there's no question that Saddam Hussein had al Qaeda ties,” the statement seemingly belied earlier assertions that Saddam and al Qaeda were “equally bad.”
The Sept. 11 commission found there was no evidence Saddam was linked to the 9/11 attacks, which killed nearly 3,000 people.
I SAY: This one doesn't even make sense. Bush said that Saddam is just as evil as al qaeda, and he also said that there is no evidence linking Saddam to the Sept 11 attacks. And? This is a flip flop? That makes absolutely NO sense at all, and I'm not even sure why they put this on here at al. Bush never said Saddam was responsible for 9/11- he merely said the thug was just as bad as the terrorists and just as danegrous...all things that are quite true!
As for the claim that the 9/11 commission found no evidence linking Hussein to the attacks, that is actually not true, because there are some links, and they have been backed up with a number of pieces of evidence, including international intel that shows 9/11 ringleader, Mohammed Attah met with Iraqi officials on at least 2 different occasions. If that's evidence of any sort of link, I don't know what is. So, CBS is wrong on both counts.
I'm still trying to figure out how saying that Saddam is just as bad as the terrorist as well as saying no evidence links him to 9/11 is a flip flop. Mind boggling...
CBS SAYS:Winning the War on Terror
"I don't think you can win it," Mr. Bush said of the war on terror in August. In an interview on NBC's "Today" show, he said, “I think you can create conditions so that . . . those who use terror as a tool are less acceptable in parts of the world."
Before the month closed, Mr. Bush reversed himself at the American Legion national convention in Nashville. He said: "We meet today in a time of war for our country, a war we did not start yet one that we will win." He later added, “we are winning, and we will win."
I SAY: Another silly attempt to find a "flip flop" by Bush. He was merely saying that you cannot ultimately WIN the battle, because there will always be terrorism and terrorists out there who will act out in evil ways...BUT, in the end we will WIN in the sense that terrorism will not be a threat to the entire globe via WMD and the like. We will combat terrorism until it's isolated to a point where we no longer have to make it our #1 priority. This is clear, and it's nowhere near a flip flop. Does CBS play semantics games just to make sure they have a certain number of "flip flops" or is there some other reason for the nonsense?
I'll stop there...the others are just as easy to refute, and you can do it yourself in your free time. Make a game out of it...catch CBS News making absurd claims. Invite friends over to play along! From Dan Rather's bogus stories, to his love of the Clintons, to the wholly left-leaning analysis of the Iraq war, CBS would be wise to think before they post their next round of supposed flip-flops.
Posted by Josh at 02:00 AM | Comments (0)
February 16, 2005
Bruce Hornsby CD's
I ordered 2 CD's from e bay today. Including shipping, one cost me $7 and the other cost me $12. Not too bad. The CD's were Bruce Hornsby's most recent (well, the most recent is his radio compilation and Halcyon Days-both of which I need to pick up.) Here Comes The Noisemakers, the 2 CD set of Bruce playing some favorites in front of a live audience, and Big Swing Face, full of songs that sound...well, they sound quite unlike most of his other stuff. I have 2 songs from Swing Face that I purchased from CONNECT and 1 song from Here Come the Noisemakers. Both really good CD's from all of the tracks I've heard.
Now, I need to find a cheap copy of Halcyon Days on e bay and get it...
Posted by Josh at 12:01 AM | Comments (0)
February 15, 2005
An Eighth Of Every Paycheck
I say if you don't think there's a MAJOR CRISIS in regards to social security, you're not living on this planet, or your body is and your brain isn't. Either way, any reasonable person knows there's a massive problem that needs to be fixed, and ownership is the answer. Then again, the answer might have been not to start the program to begin with, since it's not really my job to pay for older Americans, and when I get old, it shouldn't be up to younger Americans to take care of me. I would dare to say that social security and most other forced welfare programs (forced, in that, Americans have no choice but to fund these programs) are completely insane ideas to begin with, and the founding fathers probably wouldn't be too happy with any of it.
Well, then again...the trillion dollars the federal government spends on all sorts of nonsense would be blasphemy to the founders. The government needs to get out of the welfare business in general and leave it to charities, churches, and private individuals. That way, we would all have more money, and almost all of us would donate more to help out. When income rises, charitable donations rise as well- it's happened time and time again. None of this will ever come to pass, because there will always be those who demand welfare checks to the single parent with 12 kids who can't find a job because of his or her crack habit. And boy howdy, they need cable tv and call waiting dammit.
Too bad it's not a simple matter of sitting down like the guy does in the movie DAVE and cutting out massive amounts of government spending. If we got spending under control and put some tiny amount of reason into where the government sends the cash, many of these problems would solve themselves.
------------------------------
AN EIGHTH OF EVERY PAYCHECKBy Jeff Jacoby
The Boston Globe
Sunday, February 13, 2005
You don't have to be a financial wizard to know that Social Security is a lousy investment. Unlike the money you deposit in a bank or salt away in an IRA, you don't own the money you pay into Social Security. You have no legal right to get those dollars back, and when you die you can't pass them on to your heirs. Nor can you use your Social Security account before you retire -- you can't borrow against it and you can't cash it in. You aren't allowed to put the money into a balanced portfolio. You can't even watch as the interest accumulates, since your Social Security nest egg doesn't earn any interest.
Your nest egg, in fact, doesn't even exist. Because Social Security is financed on a pay-as-you-go system, the dollars withheld from your paycheck today aren't being saved in an account with your name. They are immediately paid out to retirees. The benefits you receive when you retire will be funded by the payroll taxes then being collected. But because the ratio of workers paying in to retirees taking out is steadily shrinking -- it has plummeted from 16 to 1 in 1940 to 3 to 1 today -- Social Security is headed for a crisis.
Within 15 years, the system will be paying out more in benefits than it collects in taxes. Its shortfalls will grow larger and larger. Bankruptcy will loom. To save Social Security, Congress will have no choice but to sharply raise payroll taxes, go even more deeply into debt, or slash the benefits paid to retirees.
This of course is the background to President Bush's campaign to create personal investment accounts, which for the first time would allow workers to own and invest -- really own, really invest -- part of the Social Security tax taken from their paychecks. With personal accounts many of the features that make Social Security such a crummy deal for today's workers would be transformed into a package most of them could support. A social-welfare program created in the age of gramophones and the Model A would be updated for a world of iPods and superhighways.
But to many Democrats, such talk is heresy. Letting Americans own some of their Social Security would be too risky, they argue - another way of saying that Americans are too dumb to be entrusted with their own money. Much better to continue entrusting it to Washington, which has managed Social Security so skillfully that workers younger than 50 know they will never get back in benefits what they are paying into the system now. (Perhaps that explains why 58 percent of Americans under 50 support personal accounts, according to a new poll by Zogby International.)
Social Security wasn't always a sucker's game. As with all Ponzi schemes, players who got in early made out like bandits. For many years, Social Security deductions were minuscule. Until 1949, the combined employer/employee tax rate was only 2 percent, and it was imposed on just the first $3,000 of income, for a maximum payroll tax of just $60 a year. The first Social Security recipient was Ida May Fuller of Ludlow, Vt., who retired in 1940 after having paid a grand total of $44 in payroll taxes. By the time she died in 1975, she had collected $20,933.52 in benefits -- a return on her "investment" of more than 47,000 percent.
It wasn't really an investment, of course. It was a forced transfer of wealth from younger persons to an older one. And as the number of Ida May Fullers grew, and the value of their benefits increased, the amount of wealth that had to be transferred kept climbing. By the time I entered the workforce in 1975, the Social Security withholding rate was 9.9 percent, applied to wages of up to $14,100. Maximum tax bite: $1,395 a year -- more than 23 times the $60 of a generation earlier.
And a generation later? Today Social Security skims off 12.4 percent of the first $90,000 earned - one-eighth of every paycheck. There are no exemptions, no deductions. It kicks in from the very first dollar of income. It is the biggest tax the average American household faces -- 80 percent of us pay more in Social Security taxes than we do in income tax.
One tiny notch at a time, payroll taxes have been ratcheted up to a level that would have been unthinkable in Franklin Delano Roosevelt's day. No wonder Social Security is so unpopular among the young. It provides no security for their retirement, while it impoverishes them in the present. In exchange for an eighth of their earnings today, it guarantees nothing but higher taxes tomorrow. That there are politicians who defend so regressive an arrangement wouldn't have surprised FDR. But how shocked he would be that they call themselves Democrats.
(Jeff Jacoby is a columnist for the Boston Globe.)
Posted by Josh at 02:35 AM | Comments (0)
February 13, 2005
Nickelodeon Rewind Collection
TVshowsonDVD.com is reporting that Nickelodeon is coming out with a Rewind collection of dvd's...releases of classic Nick shows. The first release announced was Clarissa Explains It All, and they just announced a release for The Adventures of Pete and Pete. I would be somewhat interested in Pete and Pete, but probably not too interested in Clarissa, tho I watched both shows all the time when I was younger.
Let's hope they eventually release all the episodes of Salute Your Shorts and Are You Afraid of the Dark?- both really great shows that I would pick up for sure.
Posted by Josh at 02:43 AM | Comments (0)
February 10, 2005
Is It Time to Nuke North Korea? Others?
North Korea has nukes...Iran will soon, and they refuse to stop developing their program...rogue states like Saudia Arabia, Syria, China, and many others are threatening the security of the globe. You'd think it's about time to act and prevent a disaster as opposed to what we're doing now- waiting for the disaster to arrive, and then acting only after it's too late.
Scariest thing of all? The peace hippies in this country, a large chunk of the American public who have dropped their support of military action in Iraq...these people are the biggest problem of all. So many millions of Americans refuse to see any worldwide dangers, and they refuse to have the spine to allow this country to stand up to threats and avert them before they happen. Sad to say that all too many Americans are just plain wusses. I'm all for dropping bombs in every nation that might harm us at all...I say we nuke North Korea off the face of every map on planet earth, and we do the same to thugs like Saudi Arabia, Syria, Pakistan, etc. Then, we force China's hand and do everything we can to remove that brutal regime from power, then we turn our guns at smaller, less threatening despotic regimes like Cuba, numerous African and South American nations, the middle east, and on and on. It's about time we start getting serious about these numerous growing threats before it's too late, and I say that the best to go about it is to bomb these nations back into the stone age.
Posted by Josh at 10:01 PM | Comments (0)
3 Out of 4 with a Brain Agree- Dean Is a Republican Godsend
I have said it before- the dems are clueless for even Dean get anywhere close to the party chair, and now it seems like he's got it locked up. The left is so out of touch with core American values, they have almost no chance of staying a powerful entity at all. They will soon (hopefully) be transformed into a party that can barely hold a few blue states in 2 small strips on the east and west coast...and Dean will surely be the nail in that proverbial coffin.
The democratic party will soon be headed by a man who said this of Republicans (aka, the majority of Americans):
Like I said, the dems are clueless for letting this happen, but as it turns out, their stupidity is a godsend.
Posted by Josh at 05:07 AM | Comments (0)
February 09, 2005
The Night Detective, Connect from Sony, and More
I discovered this series airing on BBC America called THE NIGHT DETECTIVE, about a detective who exposes corruption in one city and is punished by being sent off to a smaller city in England to be a detective on the overnight shift. Never seen an episode, just a few mins of episode 6 (the last episode made so far, from what I read online)...BBC America is reairing episodes starting this Monday, but it starts with series 1 episode 3 and then 4 and 5 as far as the schedule shows thru till March. Hopefully they will air all of them, so I can get them all on tape.
I need to get all the episodes of THE DISTRICT that reaired on USA...I have all the episodes either watched and on VHS or waiting to be watched and put onto VHS, sitting on the cable box DVR. It's taking up too much space. I also started recording all the episodes of Disney Channel's EVEN STEVENS, since they will eventually stop airing that show at all, and I don't want to not have them archived.
Discovered a new (new to the US) animated series airing on Nick called MY FATHER THE ROCK STAR, a show about a kid whose dad is Rock Zilla, a mega rockstar who looks a lot like Gene Simmons from KISS (Simmons is the executive producer on the show according to the show's opening.) It's pretty good from the two episodes I saw so far...got one of them on tape, and since it's NICK, they're sure to replay them all numerous times.
I downloaded the CONNECT music software, it's Sony's online music service...I had it on my other computer and this one in the past, and "bought" a number of songs with those McDonalds coupons they had for a while a couple years ago. I had to e mail support to get them to remove all devices from my computer, because it goes to a limit of 3 devices you can use the account on, but I reinstalled Windows a few times, so I lost all the deactivate files. Good that they helped me out and I got my music back...the 8 or 9 songs I downloaded at least. I made a CD with all those songs and the theme from HUFF and NUMB3RS.
Not much going on really. Just sitting around waiting for something to happen, tho I don't think anything is going to JUST happen. Too bad, huh? Maybe not. If something did just happen, it might be bad. Feeling pretty stressed out lately about everything. Work, the need for some school, my car STILL being in the shop- we found out today that the guy says it's NOT the distributor, and has no idea what it is...and will have to continue to look for the problem (it's been 3 weeks already, and I am getting tired of having no car, not being able to go somewhere and stay if I want to...) Hopefully this all won't cost too much. That's got me stressed out. My life in general has me stressed out, and I feel like I have a friggin ulcer. Haven't been feeling well lately- coughing a lot which means I get all stuffed up, which means I can't breathe, which means I get sick to my stomach, which means I feel like I'm going to throw up, which causes my stomach to hurt even more...top all of that off with the fact that I, for some reason, feel very nervous in general lately, and it's not so much fun. I will surely live tho, but it's not so thrilling.
I want to make a documentary on social anxiety disorder. I think that would be an interesting topic for a film, since I have never personally seen anything on it in documentary form...and since so many people have no idea what it is, and when they do read something about it, it's often times the case that the material doesn't completely cue them into what all goes in with the disorder and what all problems someone who suffers from it experiences. I really don't see myself having the balls to find a way to make any of that happen, at least not right now, so...
I just remembered I haven't even done anything about my taxes. I got my W2 and all, but I'm not 100% positive where I put it. I guess I'm clearly not too worried about getting my money back, huh? I need to pick up THE BRAK SHOW dvd and Night Court season 1 and The Wayans Bros season 1. Sometime...
I'm off to watch the hilariously funny british series, MY FAMILY...I saw part of the episode from earlier, and they were in a play for christmas or something.
Posted by Josh at 11:15 PM | Comments (2)
February 05, 2005
He's Just Not That Into You
I'm reading the book, He's Just Not That Into You by comic, Greg Behrendt and Liz Tuccillo (she's some writer on Sex and The City)...it's a guide for women, all about men. I'm a man, and yes I am reading it. Why? Because I love Greg Behrendt- he's hilarious from all the stuff I have seen from him (on HBO and Comedy Central mainly). Anyhow, it's interesting so far, and funny as I thought it'd be.
It's comforting to know that Greg says that if a guy likes you, he will want to talk to you daily, if not hourly. I sometimes wonder if I want to talk to my (not sure what to call her...she's not my girlfriend, we but are dating) too much, or if I'm coming on too strong. I try my best to be cool and not get into serious conversations about feelings. Long story, but I'm just taking it day by day for now, and leaving all the mushy stuff and serious convo's about feelings out for now. I do try to tell her how beautiful I think she is tho, as much as I can...because she really is, and I don't want her to forget how beautiful she is in my eyes. I don't say I love you that much, but I do my best with my actions and the way I treat her to show her that I do, indeed, love her with all of my heart.
Interesting stuff...much of which is quite obvious and clear to me, since I AM a guy, and I do like women. But, also some insights that make me feel a little better about my situation and the way I feel about the woman I love. Just to know that someone else sees things the same way is somewhat comforting, I guess.
The format of the book is nice. It has questions asked by women, and Greg gives the answers- it's mostly him telling the girl that when the guy does X, Y, and Z that this means that he's just not that into you, and to get rid of him to find a guy who IS into you and won't do the bad things that show he's not into you. ("Don't waste the pretty", Greg says...)
Here is an excerpt from the book on the chapter about guys who don't want the title of boyfriend ("I don't want to be your boyfriend" will always mean "I don't want to be your boyfriend", he points out.)
I would have to disagree with him in the first chapter and intro when he talks about how men are driven by sex, because I don't feel that way at all. I'm surely not driven by sex- personally, when I'm with the woman I'm currently with, sex is totally out of my mind, and I have no desire to pursue that option. Sure, sometimes I want to, but in the scope of things, it certainly isn't the biggest factor or anywhere near it.
At the same time, I'm trying to finish the novel, The Breathtaker, about a serial killer who attacks people in the line of tornadoes...all about weather, storm chasers, a small town police chief, his daughter, and the search for a ritualistic killer. Nearly done with that, and it's also been a pretty good book thus far.
I need to pick up the book, The Case For Freedom by Natan Charansky (not sure if that's how you spell his name, and I'm just too lazy to look it up right now.)
Posted by Josh at 02:08 PM | Comments (0)