The idiot who was arrested at UT for asking an idiotic and obscene question speaks!
Get this- the guy REALLY IS that dumb.
Seriously, this guy is a college student! A college student for crissakes. I wonder what his parents think of a wasted 4 years in college...he'll surely leave as vulgar and idiotic as he was when he arrived. (They must be so proud.)
Just a little taste of how idiotic this guy is:
I am Ajai Raj, and I am a jackass.In his article, which I enjoyed and commend him for, Mr. Sampath quoted the former president of the Student Events Center, the organization which arranged the event. He wrote:
"The person had been disruptive the entire event," said Matt Hardigree, former Student Events Center president. "He took the opportunity to say something lewd and offensive and then made masturbatory gestures as he exited."
And what do I have to say in rebuttal? Not a goddamn thing.Matt Hardigree got it spot-on! From the beginning I was yelling obscenities along with my friends, roaring at Ms. Coulter's right-wing bullshit festival the way no one else had the balls to.
Again...seriosuly?! How pathetic.
MORE: Dennis Prager writes on the lack of discourse from liberal students as opposed to conservatives. This idiot above is a prime example of this.
-------------
You have to wonder if Mike McCurry has stopped taking his meds or something. Because, he's losing it!
Here is part of his most recent post on the Huffington site, whatever it's called (yes, it's open, but clicking that window is too much work for me right now):
Here’s an interesting fact: four million children die each year around the world within one week of being born. Three million (yes, 3,000,000) babies could be saved within the first 24 hours of being born if they had proper sanitation, clean water, nutrition. Simple things. Things that cost less than $10-$20 per kid.
Ummm okay? Really...what can you even say to this? This post just seemed highly odd to me period.
-------------
Finally, sticking with the weirdo posters at the Huffington site, Paul Rieckhoff (from what I've read, he's a conspiracy nut who is doing all he can to "Expose" the truth about the war in Iraq- one of the truths is that the draft is coming- shocking, a nutty who parrots the draft nonsense!) writes about the body armor problem and attacks Donald Rumsfeld in the process. It's all Rumsfeld's fault of course, if you listen to Rieckhoff, who says:
But why does it always take the Pentagon or Rumsfeld being publicly embarrassed before we see things corrected? Remember the challenging questions he faced publicly from a brave Soldier in Kuwait last year? And where is the accountability for failures in Washington? Two years into the war, and they still don't get it.
Didn't someone inform this guy that this "brave soldier" was actually asking the question because a reporter there talked him into doing it for him? He wasn't brave in asking the question, he was stupid to be fooled by a sneaky reporter who shouldn't have set this bogus question up like that. Funny how Rieckhoff mentions this "brave soldier" yet never mentions the rest of the story!
Most of his post is an attack on Rumsefeld. He says that Rummy never spent anytime with the troops outside of a photo op, which is just uncalled for. He also says that he thinks Rumsfeld should put on a faulty vest and go on patrol and see what it's like.
The big problem is, he never mentions who is really at fault here- the Clinton white house that gutted the military budget, which included weapons and equipment. He lays all the blame at the foot of the current SecDef, while never once mentioning that this problem of body armor has been years in the making...since the mid 90's, in fact. When you cut budgets, guess what? Needed equipment isn't purchased and properly tested when it actually IS purchased! Go figure. It's rather dishonest for Rieckhoff to tell tiny bits of the story without exposing all of it. Sure, the problem of body armor seems to be a real issue, but if you were to listen solely to Rieckhoff here, you'd think that it was a simple issue of Rumsfeld being evil and not supporting the troops...we know how thinks Rumsfeld doesn't support our troops, since he says so:
Great job by the Marine Corps Times. At least somebody in the press is looking out for our troops (because Mr. Rumsfeld sure isn’t ).
If we're going to deal with a serious issue, let's try not to make it into an attack piece, and maybe next time we could, oh I don't know, tell the WHOLE story maybe?