April 30, 2005

Parents Unable to Stop Public Education Homosexual Agenda

(508 Words) Posted at April 30, 2005 07:43 AM in Current Events .

The liberals want to brainwash your children as early as possible. Liberal Massachusetts has a kindergarten program that teaches kids about homosexuals and "families" with 2 gay parents...

http://estabrook.ci.lexington.ma.us/Diversity/kindergartenbag.html

Sickening. The homosexuals will do anything to force their alternative (alternative to NORMAL) lifestyle down all of our throats...their new tactic is to start as early in a child's life as possible, so the brainwashing will be totally set in by the time they become adults. Disgusting...

This is why liberals need to be stopped from their destruction of the family, traditional values, and this country as we know it...

In Concord, MA...David Parker simply wanted the school of his 5 year old (yes 5 YEAR OLD) to inform him and his wife if they were going to teach his young song about homosexuality and gay marriage and the like. He wanted to opt his son out of any discussion. Here, you can find a link to e-mails sent back and forth from Parker and the school about this issue. They basically refused his request for notification if they were teach his son about homosexuality. He demaned that he was the parent and he would not allow his son to be taught these topics.

The principal agreed to meet with Parker and when Parker went the school refused his request to actually be a parent. They wouldn't allow his son to opt out of the homosexual lessons and wouldn't notify him about such discussions that he didn't want his son being a part of. He refused to leave the school until they agreed to allow his son to opt out and for the parents to be notified. They still refused this simple request, by which they refuse him his rights as a parent, so they called the police and he was arrested for trespassing.

All in the bogus name of diversity. Public education is dead. Liberals have taken over the public schools like they have taken over American universities, and it's all disgusting beyond belief. In the US in 2005, a parent no longer has a right as to what his child is taught...a phony claim of diversity can be used to teach children as young as 5 about homosexual lifestyles, lifestyles that the great majority of Americans find offensive and disgusting. The parent has no rights in 2005 America. The liberals and their BS PC nonsense has taken hold and there's very little most of us can do...there is ONE thing we can do, and it's called private schools- schools which offer a better education, higher test scores, and a better overall approach to education in general.

The homosexuals do themselves no favors by forcing their agenda like this. It's not long before Americans get sick and tired of this constant attack on traditional values and fight back. You can live your perverted lifestyle any way you want...but STOP FORCING that abnormal lifestyle on the rest of us. Americans will only take this assault on their values so long.

Reported elsehwere:
Michelle Malkin- "WHO'S IN A FAMILY?"

Comments

So true,Josh,so true. I dunno what's gonna happen,but it ain't gonna be good. As much as I would like to have children,I'm glad that I don't right now. I would be constantly on edge,worrying that some stranger,will legally try and force them to learn to be fags. I wouldn't stand for it,and you're right when you say the vast majority of Americans find it disgusting too.

What the hell right does the public "education" system think it has? It's supposed to teach readin',writin',and 'rythmatic...not blowjobs and buttsex. And the big pisser,is that these filthy devient heathens,are enormously outnumbered by moral Americans,yet they somehow have been given authority. I ain't happy.

I don't bother queers,and I don't harass them or go hunting for them to bash,so why do they attack the rest of us? Vile bastards,they are. They remind me of muslims....always picking the fights and starting trouble,yet always claiming to be "oopressed" and "discriminated". They are not oppressed,but they should be. They should all get the ever lovin' shit kicked out of them everyday,then see how much they wanna bitch and moan. Same goes for anyone who supports them.

Posted by Moe at April 30, 2005 04:22 PM

Parents Unable to Stop Public Education Negro Agenda

- Posted at April 30, 1951 07:43 AM in Current Events. -

The liberals want to brainwash your children as early as possible. Liberal Massachusetts has a kindergarten program that teaches kids about Negroes and "families" with parents from two different races...

Sickening. The Negroes will do anything to force their alternative (alternative to NORMAL) lifestyle down all of our throats...their new tactic is to start as early in a child's life as possible, so the brainwashing will be totally set in by the time they become adults. Disgusting...

This is why liberals need to be stopped from their destruction of the family, traditional values, and this country as we know it...

In Concord, MA...David Parker simply wanted the school of his 5 year old (yes 5 YEAR OLD) to inform him and his wife if they were going to teach his young song about interracial and Negro marriages and the like. He wanted to opt his son out of any discussion. Here, you can find a link to e-mails sent back and forth from Parker and the school about this issue. They basically refused his request for notification if they were teach his son about interracial relationships. He demanded that he was the parent and he would not allow his son to be taught these topics.

The principal agreed to meet with Parker and when Parker went the school refused his request to actually be a parent. They wouldn't allow his son to opt out of the tolerance lessons and wouldn't notify him about such discussions that he didn't want his son being a part of. He refused to leave the school until they agreed to allow his son to opt out and for the parents to be notified. They still refused this simple request, by which they refuse him his rights as a parent, so they called the police and he was arrested for trespassing.

All in the bogus name of diversity. Public education is dead. Liberals have taken over the public schools like they have taken over American universities, and it's all disgusting beyond belief. In the US in 2005, a parent no longer has a right as to what his child is taught...a phony claim of diversity can be used to teach children as young as 5 about interracial lifestyles, lifestyles that the great majority of Americans find offensive and disgusting. The parent has no rights in 2005 America. The liberals and their BS PC nonsense has taken hold and there's very little most of us can do...there is ONE thing we can do, and it's called segregated private schools- schools which offer a better education, higher test scores, and a better overall approach to education in general.

The Negroes do themselves no favors by forcing their agenda like this. It's not long before Americans get sick and tired of this constant attack on traditional values and fight back. You can live your perverted lifestyle any way you want...but STOP FORCING that abnormal lifestyle on the rest of us. Americans will only take this assault on their values so long.

Posted by Convert at April 30, 2005 05:29 PM

lol. i love people who compare the homosexual lifestyle with blacks or any other race...a skin color and a lifestyle choice is equal in their eyes. its so beyond absurd.

you cannot equate the struggle for civil rights for blacks with the homosexual push in schools, govt policy, etc. your born with your skin color, you make a choice who you have a rship with/take as a sexual partner.

blacks wanted what everyone has...in regards to marriage and interracial marriage- one would simply want what all americans have. the right of a man to marry a woman. 1 man to marry 1 woman. thats what marriage is...thats what its always been. there are a few outside of the mainstream that believe marriage is 1 guy and ten woman, but its not traditional, its not the foundation of marriage, etc.

gays are asking for special rights...for 1 man to marry 1 man and take part in an alternative marriage tradition that theyre trying to create out of the blue. no one has the right to change thousand yrs old tradition just because they demand a change. they havent lost any rights and theyre not being denied any rights. gays can, in fact, marry...they just have to stick to what marriage was created to be and what it has always been. a gay man can marry a female, or a lesbian can marry 1 man. simple enough. thats not keeping them from any rights.

gays arent a special class with special rights. americans have agreed with that and have voted down gay marriage in numerous states. lets not try to equate skin color with a choice of who you decide to 'stick it' to.

Posted by Joshua Taj Bozeman at April 30, 2005 06:39 PM

all common sense, id say moe. too bad too many people lack common sense. the very basic common sense that is needed just to make it thru life!

they havent been denied any rights, as you point out. gays have the right to take part in marriage as any of us do...theyre asking for a brand new special form of marriage they want to create out of nothing. thats NOT fair, and thats NOT right. spcial rights because a group claims bogus oppression- thats crazy. 1 man can marry 1 woman, thats the way its always been. thats tradition. americans want to protect a sacred tradition like marriage...wanting to keep hold and protect something that is the base of society is called bigoted in our society. that, as well, is crazy.

everyone has to wonder how on earth the gay agenda got so big and so powerful. i think a lot of it is- too many people are afraid to speak out. theyre afraid that if they say 'i oppose your lifestyle...i oppose youre attempt at breaking our thousand yrs old tradition' that people will call them a bigot. that people will label them a homophobe. hell, most gays would label my views here homophobic- which is also a puzzle. how the agenda took a word and transformed its meaning. homophobia means an extreme irrational fear of gays. ive no such thing, but the lobby is so powerful (as i said, out of fear by most of us) that theyve demonized everyone who opposes their choice of lifestyle. its idiotic, and i refuse to allow the agenda to label me as full of hatred when there is no hatred.

americans have spoken out on this numerous times. the polls show that we dont approve of killing the tradition of marriage...that we dont want to allow gays to create their own marriage tradition out of nothing. they can have their ceremonies and call themselves husband and wife, or wife and wife or whatever if they want...but we shouldnt have to embrace it and allow them into the tradition that they need no part of.

Posted by Joshua Taj Bozeman at April 30, 2005 06:45 PM

Hey Convert...I'm in an interracial relationship.

Dick head…

Posted by Hinc at May 1, 2005 09:23 AM

Moe wrote:

"They are not oppressed,but they should be. They should all get the ever lovin' shit kicked out of them everyday,then see how much they wanna bitch and moan. Same goes for anyone who supports them."

Then Josh wrote:

"all common sense, id say moe."

Josh, I truly hope you don't endorse or would tolerate ANYONE getting "the ever lovin' shit kicked out of them everyday." *This* is your defintion of "common sense"? Violence? Who's full of "hate" again?

Posted by cramalamma at May 1, 2005 10:34 PM

i cant speak for moe, but i think he was saying that those who claim oppression all the time should get their butts kicked...not gays in general, youd have to ask him.

as for my reply...i actually read the comment and replied 20 mins or so later. i didnt even remember all that was said. i agreed with the basic idea that there is no oppression and that whining is annoying. that i dont agree with the lifestyle choice and dont want my kids being taught that its normal/safe/okay, etc.

i dont personally think anyone should get their asses kicked. well, besides terrorist scum, rapists, murderers- the normal bunch of scumbags that most people would like to see beaten a few times. not gays tho. i dont agree with their choice, i dont think it should be taught to our children as if its an acceptable substitute to the family that is thousands of yrs old, etc. but thats about it for me personally...

Posted by Joshua Taj Bozeman at May 1, 2005 10:39 PM

I'm relieved to hear that, Josh. Thanks for clarifying. I wanted to give you the benefit of the doubt, but I wanted to make sure, too.

Posted by cramalamma at May 1, 2005 11:10 PM

Cramalamma:

Josh pretty much summed up what I meant. I don't like the gay lifestyle,but I do not condone hunting them down and bashing them just for being gay. I just don't want them prancing around and raising a ruckus and whining about nonsense. I hate whiners.

To me,what every race,religion,lifestyle,political view,etc in America should focus on,is that we all have equal rights. That's fair,isn't it? But the problem is,all these little sub-groups are wanting a "little more", and I ain't gonna tolerate that. We are all free, safe and equal to worship, speak, screw, and anything else,without fear of persecution. Isn't that enough? Why do gays want more? What more is there? They seem to want a "little more" than what the rest of us have, and I don't care for that. It's whining for no good reason, and it irks me.

The gays have long claimed that being gay is "natural". Really? Well,if it's natural,why do they feel it needs to be taught in schools? If it's "natural", then each individual will either be one way or another eventually, so why push it?

Posted by Moe at May 2, 2005 04:49 AM

All they are teaching in schools is unconditional acceptance of other human beings (hate the sin, not the sinner)

... which could be taught right out of a little book I'm sure you're familiar with.


As for you guys and your name calling ("heathens", "liberals", "whiners"), you do know that hating people, passing judgment, calling for violence, and throwing stones, will get you into hell as fast as any other sin.


I also have a question -- at what age did you decide to be attracted to people of the other sex?

I ask because I believe that God made me a heterosexual. I couldn't be attracted to people of my same sex if I tried.

Posted by Convert at May 2, 2005 11:02 AM

liberal and whiner isnt calling names. its stating facts. stating a fact is not a sin.

i see you link to the UCC, which explains your absurd statement that god made you heterosexual. the ucc is a sin ridden church, especially in their refusal to condemn the sin of homosexuality.

theyre not teaching unconditional acceptance...theyre teaching its okay and normal to be gay and that little billy with 2 gay mommies is okay and that his family is equal. its not. the bible clearly states that sex is for marriage...and marriage is for 1 man and 1 woman. that itself tells us that the bible clearly lists homosexuality as a sin. then there are other references to homosexuality being a sin as well. you might not think its a sin, but i happen to go with the bible on this (in regards to the religious perspective of the matter.)

Posted by Joshua Taj Bozeman at May 2, 2005 11:30 AM

woooooo
wooooo

Posted by ali at May 12, 2005 08:11 AM

Imagine if your life partner, your best friend and loyal companion, was to suddenly fall into a coma. Instead of coming to you, the hospital is forced by state law to contact the patient's distant, estranged, and particularly prejudiced relatives. All authority to make decisions regarding the well being of your partner are stripped from you, and you are left completely powerless and shattered. Furthermore, you are banned from the hospital room and are unable to merely stand beside your loved one as the life support is pulled. The family is rather unaffected, if not even relieved, to have abolished what they consider the biggest disappointment to their bloodline. You however, are an emotional wreck, a reject of "normal" society left to wonder how this injustice was alllowed. How is it fair that you are regarded by law as a lesser individual, with lesser rights, only because you happen to be a minority. This is just one very realistic example of the numerous injustices homosexuals are forced to endure. As they cannot marry, they are cheated out of the rights and benefits that any other heterosexual citizens are entitled to. THIS IS INJUSTICE.

This is not a utilitarianistic system (greatest happiness for the greatest number), as most Americans seem to view it. The fuction of the american government, as im sure you will all agree, should be to uphold and protect the individual rights and liberties of all the people, regardless of religion, race, creed, or sexual orientation. In the status quo, marriage between gay couples are forbidden so the rights that come along with marriage are unavailabe to homosexuals.(http://www.gay-civil-unions.com/HTML/Why_Make_It_Legal.htm) Does it really seem fair to you that just because someone is attracted to a person of the same gender, they be legally denied all these rights? These are not "special" rights. These are rights legally available to over 90% of the American population. These are BASIC. Granting the remaining 10% marriage rights could by no means be considered "special". Rather it would just bring them up to par with the rest of us.

"your born with your skin color, you make a choice who you have a rship with/take as a sexual partner. " - Josh. Interesting comment. To say that being gay is a choice is completely absurd. Why would anyone choose to be gay with all the prejudice and hatred geared towards them nowadays?? A gay boy at my school actually committed suicide because he was sick of the torment and riducule of his peers. This boy would have given everything to be attracted to girls but ultimately resorted to a gun in his mouth to ease the pain. THIS IS NOT FANTASY. It sickens me that people are closed minded and ignorant to make such claims.
"1 man can marry 1 woman, thats the way its always been. thats tradition. americans want to protect a sacred tradition like marriage...wanting to keep hold and protect something that is the base of society is called bigoted in our society." - Josh. 1) Tradition once held that in marriage the man was the owner of the woman, like property. Ancient hebrew law required a man to become the husband of a deceased brother's widow. Tradition once held that in order to vote, you must be a land owning white male. Traditions change over time because we realize that some of them are not fair, and kees certain people oppressed. 2) Marriage is NOT sacred. Marriage rights are not given to people by a church, they are given by law. The constitution grants us freedom from the religious ideologies of our brothers. The government has no right to deny rights on the pretext of any religious doctrine or personal belief. 3) Heterosexual marriage is not the base of our society, my friend, LOVE LIBERTY AND UNITY are.

Gay are just like everyone else, so why treat them differently? They are not criminals or bad people. This kind of prejudice is irrational, and unjust. I urgue you to find it in your hearts to tolerate, accept, and respect all of your fellow men and women, regardless of their sexual orientation.

Posted by Brian at May 30, 2005 03:06 PM
Posting of new comments has been disabled for this post.