The Blue Site

Vanessa Kerry- No College Under Bush?

Vanessa Kerry (John's daughter- I believe she's the one who wore the see-thru dress at the Cannes film festival with her nips hanging out, how classy!) was just on MSNBC and took the dumbest question from Chris 'the hack' Matthews (cannot stand the guy)...he asked her how her dad keeps this focused zen-like attitude with all this pressure (I assume he thinks Bush is going insane? Maybe I missed this!)

Anyhow...Vanessa talks about how her dad has traveled the country for 2 yrs (as opposed to being in Washington doing the job he gets paid GOOD taxpayer money to do- or not do, as is the case), and he's talked to so many people who have said they pray he gets elected so they can have better lives (under Bush, it's just so bleak...dark, cold, bleak, almost like communist Russia- oh the agony!) She said that so many people tell her dad- only if you get elected can I go to school. Bush has increased federal student aid by over 40%, yet no one can go to college from what she says (unless, of course, daddy gets elected. Yippee, daddy!) She also said that people say to her dad, please get elected so I can have a job again. Funny- the left praises ol' Bill 'I can't stop lying' Clinton as a prophet of the party, yet the unemployment rate is LOWER than when he was reelected in 1996 (5.6% then, 5.4% now under Bush...and that's not taking into account home based businsesses and jobs that would make a net gain of jobs of at least 1 million or so.)

Remember, if it wasn't so serious- it'd be hilarious. PLEASE elect daddy so people can go to school, work, and have food in their tiny little famished bellies. Gag me.

The Myth Kept Strong by the Pinheads at Americans United

The funny thing about Americans United?

They have the audacity to quote the 1st Amendment that they completely trash every day.

This is the group that demands IN GOD WE TRUST not be said in school or posted anywhere in schools...demands we not allow federal money to go to any religious charities (faith based initiatives that help people are badddd to these people.) They demand that ten commandments monuments never been seen in public areas.

Read the law people-
CONGRESS shall make no law respecting an ESTABLISHMENT OF RELIGION, or PROHIBITING the FREE EXERCISE THEREOF.

With the help of liberals like Americans Clueless...I mean, United- Congress and other agencies HAVE violated the law by prohibiting the free exercise of religion. If demanding a school remove the national model isn't doing this, then nothing constitutes "prohibition"!! The law, as I have said many many times, applies ONLY to congress, not public schools or court houses or state governments...and congress is only stopped from making laws that (if you read the letter to the danbury church as Jefferson wrote it) establish a particular Christian denomination as the official US religion. These people completely steal Jefferson's term used NOWHERE in the US Constitution (separation of church and state- which doesn't mean what it's come to mean by liberal judges, and clueless conservative judges alike), plus- they've trashed his memory by demanding a ban on public religion (Jefferson was a christian who mandated all schools he opened would teach the bible- to use this man's ideas to pervert what he said to the danbury church is despicable.)

Congress has never made any law attempting to (as Jefferson promised would not happen) establish any particular denomination as the official religion, and as mentioned- the rule applies ONLY to congress and not courts, schools, public offices, state govt, etc. It's a bogus plan to destroy religion in this country, and the fact that a so-called reverend heads the group is downright scary. Ol' Barry and the rest of his AU cronies are as clueless as possible, and they're as dishonest as they possibly can be.

Too bad much of the media plays into the lies and the distortions, along with help from the misguided courts, public officials, and others.

Carlos Alazraqui- AKA Rocko, AKA Garcia

I love the Comedy Central series, Reno 911, and I also love the Nicktoon from the 90's, Rocko's Modern Life. I saw the actor who plays Garcia on some comedy show (I always knew his name...Carlos Alazraqui, but I never put two and two together until last night, when I said to myself- wait, this is the guy who did the voice for Rocko and Spunky, so I checked imdb.com, and what do you know- he IS the same guy who did the voices...

"Rocko's Modern Life" (1993) TV Series (voice) .... Rocko/Spunky/Rabbit

I've been watching the show for the 2 seasons it's been on, and I just figured this out. Weird.

Kerry Speaks Again of His New "International" Friendly Policy

YET AGAIN, proving he just DOESN'T get it...John Kerry spoke in New Hampshire today, and he told the audience that we had to go into this election knowing that it would be an international thing, that the whole world would be looking upon the voters to do the right thing (and vote for him)...that, the world would demand we go back to the american experience- one where we lead and not bully (Bush has bullied? If you believe that, have some more crack!), that we cannot mislead (here we go again with this word...how on earth did Bush mislead anyone? He did not...Kerry voted for the same thing with the same exact intel- which means, in Kerry's view, he's also a liar!)

The obvious problem with these statements is- we shouldn't care one bit what other nations want us to do in our election, or what they think of us (you'll never get the majority of the godless europeans to like us!), and the fact is- this is the US election and no one outside of the US has any business in it whatsoever. Kerry's views that we have to worry about what other nations think and we have to justify our actions to them is 1. idiotic and 2. dangerous as hell. He claims he'll never give any nation or international body a veto over US policy and action, but that's nonsense when you hear him talk everyday about how we have to think in an international way and how we have to justify our actions to other countries. This scares me personally, because if Kerry were to win, US policy would drastically change- and in a negative manner! Our policy would surely become much more lame- we would be forced into going with the "international" flow and appeasing terrorist groups and not fighting them before they get here on US soil...we would surely be looking at the end of pre-emptive attacks on those nations and groups who pose a serious risk to our safety, and like most of Europe and the UN, we would see an end to actually destroying terrorist groups. Europeans have dealt with terrorism on their soil for decades, and they've done almost nothing about it...the war on terror, you'll notice, only started as a world wide effort when we were attacked...Kerry doesn't understand that. Kerry doesn't seem to grasp the reality that European nations and the UN don't act- they talk, and talk, and talk, and talk...they pass an endless stream of resolutions that serve absolutely no purpose. We can't go convert to that dangerous European mindset with terrorism. With Kerry, this is almost a certainty.

As I've said before...the scariest thing might be the fact that, according to the polls, half of this nation wants to go over to this appeasement policy. The sad reality is, it will take another Sept 11-like attack to wake half of this nation up.

Kerry's Clueless Stepson: Bush a "Coke Head"

Chris Heinz...a brainless jackass, just like his mother. The people that vote for Kerry should think of this nonsense. These people are all out of their minds.
-- -- -- -- --
October 31, 2004 -- THIS campaign is ending just in time before someone gets hurt. John Kerry's stepson, Chris Heinz, 31, displayed his mother Teresa's famous lack of rhetorical restraint at a recent campaign event with a group of Wharton students. Philadelphia magazine reports: "Heinz accused Kerry's opponents - 'our enemies' - of making the race dirty. 'We didn't start out with negative ads calling George Bush a cokehead,' he said, before adding, 'I'll do it now.' Asked later about it, Heinz said, 'I have no evidence. He never sold me anything.'" Heinz also reminded writer Sasha Issenberg of Pat Buchanan by saying, "One of the things I've noticed is the Israel lobby - the treatment of Israel as the 51st state, sort of a swing state." Buchanan was blasted as an anti-Semite years ago when he cited Israel's "amen corner" in Congress.

A Post That Will Offend Mormons and Wtinesses Alike!

You know the scariest thing about Utah? Mormons! You know the scariest thing about Mormons? They actually violate a basic principle of Christianity by treating Joseph Smtih (who was a criminal and a liar) almost as if he were a second Jesus- a prophet who made many predictions (none of which came true- the world will end in the 1840's, my friends! whoops...change that...) Just flipping thru the channels and I saw BYU TV and the woman was talking about "prophet" Joseph...and it just reminded me of how crazy these people are. All Mormons out there- no offense, you're no crazier than the ol' witnesses who take their every cue from the watchtower and refuse to listen to anything outside of it (like, oh I dunno...the bible maybe?) So, don't feel bad, you're surely not alone!

Greg Palast Claims He Isn't Partisan- Yea Right

Greg Palast, as usual, made an ass of himself on Fox News' Hannity and Colmes. He claimed Republicans hate blacks and they're doing anything to make sure blacks don't vote...he mentioned jim crowe, knight riders, etc. He promises to Hannity, he's not a partisan- yet if you read ANY of his website, that claim is totally blown away. His site is nothing but a I hate Bush attack.

So pathetic. Why he can't just be honest, I've no idea...
------------------------------------
Also...
I went to see the new horror movie, SAW, today, and I must say- it was the scariest movie I've ever seen...along with it being the most disturbing movie I've ever seen. Some plot contrivances are present, but it's so good, they're easy to overlook.

John Kerry's New Global Test

John Kerry is out of his mind, and his latest comments prove as much.

You'll notice, he says that if he's president, he'll have to justify this nation's actions to the entire world...similar to what he said during the debate with the global test (where we have to show the world what we're doing and why, and prove that we have a legitimate reason for doing so.) He claims no nation or body has a veto over US action, but that's bogus, and his comments prove it.

If this man were to be elected, we would all be in real trouble. Remember, as Bush has noted- Kerry voted against the first gulf war- with that in mind, we realize that NO action could meet Kerry's test, and that, my friends, is scary.
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
reported on drudge's site:
Kerry Says Saddam 'Might Be Gone' Had He Been President
Fri Oct 29 2004 10:02:35 ET

NBCNEWS Brokaw interviewed John Kerry Thursday evening.

Brokaw: "If you had been President, Saddam Hussein would be in power."

Kerry: "Not necessarily."

Brokaw: "You said you wouldn't go to war against him."

Kerry: "That's not true. Because under the inspection process, Saddam Hussein was required to destroy those kinds of materials and weapons."

Brokaw: "But he wasn't destroying them."

Kerry: "That's what you have inspectors for. That's why I voted for the threat of force, because he only does things when you have a legitimate threat of force. It's irresponsible to suggest that if I were President, he wouldn't be gone. He might be gone, because if he hadn't complied, we might have had to go to war, but if we did, we would have gone with allies, so the American people weren't carrying the entire burden. And the entire world would understand why we did it."

Kerry Lies Again? (Gasp!)

Again, John Kerry first lies, and second- comes up with this insane statement that we must prove to the world what we're doing and must have all our "allies" with us before we take action. Mr. Kerry- the so called allies- they're NOT WITH US. They have said, they will NOT enter Iraq no matter what. Face these facts, and stop using our natl. security as a political tool. It's disgusting. Also, I guess we should point this out to you, since you seem to be completely clueless- the ENTIRE WORLD doesn't need to know a damned thing about why we do anything. We act to protect the US not the "entire world," and you claim you wouldn't give a veto to any other nation, yet you constantly say we must meet a test to show the world what we're doing, and that what we're doing is justified.

The inspections didn't work. They never worked...for over a decade, nothing worked. Action was what worked. Get that thru your thick skull. If you had been president, Hussein would still be in power, and you know it. Just admit as much, and shut up.
-------------------------------------------

Kerry Says Saddam 'Might Be Gone' Had He Been President
Fri Oct 29 2004 10:02:35 ET

NBCNEWS Brokaw interviewed John Kerry Thursday evening.

Brokaw: "If you had been President, Saddam Hussein would be in power."

Kerry: "Not necessarily."

Brokaw: "You said you wouldn't go to war against him."

Kerry: "That's not true. Because under the inspection process, Saddam Hussein was required to destroy those kinds of materials and weapons."

Brokaw: "But he wasn't destroying them."

Kerry: "That's what you have inspectors for. That's why I voted for the threat of force, because he only does things when you have a legitimate threat of force. It's irresponsible to suggest that if I were President, he wouldn't be gone. He might be gone, because if he hadn't complied, we might have had to go to war, but if we did, we would have gone with allies, so the American people weren't carrying the entire burden. And the entire world would understand why we did it."

The Radical and the Reactionary

THE RADICAL AND THE REACTIONARY
By Jeff Jacoby
The Boston Globe

Thursday, October 28, 2004

Bill Clinton was back on the campaign trail this week, a fine embodiment of the stakes in the 2004 election.

Still recovering from his open-heart surgery, the last Democratic president seemed a bit gaunt and not quite as boisterous as the shameless old rogue we got to know so well during the 1990s. But the familiar good humor was there, and so was the charisma and the engaging sunniness. A huge crowd turned out to see him in Philadelphia, where he rather cheerfully painted a picture of good times gone bad since the accession of George W. Bush. When he embraced John Kerry in a bear hug, the message could hardly have been clearer: *Things were better under Clinton, and they can be better under Kerry. Return to the policies of the 1990s, and we'll all feel good again.*

And there in a nutshell is the choice in this election: Forward with Bush into a difficult future, or backward with Kerry to the familiar ways of the past. It would be an easy decision, except for one thing: The familiar ways of the past led to Sept. 11.

Kerry is a liberal Democrat, but in this campaign he is running as a reactionary: as one who wants to reverse course, to go back to the attitudes and practices that guided US policy when Clinton and the elder George Bush were in office. The younger Bush may be a Republican, but he is running this year as a radical. Profoundly transformed by 9/11, he sees the old playbook as feckless and dangerous, and is determined to set a revolutionary new course.

Kerry's words confirm his Sept. 10 mindset. Asked by The New York Times this month how 9/11 changed him, he replied: "It didn't change me much at all." On CNN in July he said, "What American would not trade [for] the economy we had in the 1990s, the fact that we were not at war and young Americans were not deployed?"

But of course we were at war during the Clinton and Bush I years, and we repeatedly came under attack -- at the World Trade Center, at the Kenya and Tanzania embassies, at the Khobar Towers barracks, at the port where the USS Cole was docked. We were at war, but only the enemy was fighting.

Bush II looks back on the 1990s as a period of tragic complacency: "Most Americans still felt that terrorism was something distant, something that would not strike on a large scale in America," he said in New Jersey last week. "That . . . attitude is what blinded America to the war being waged against us. And by not seeing the war, our government had no comprehensive strategy to fight it."

For Kerry and his entourage, however, all this war talk is overwrought. A key adviser, former ambassador Richard Holbrooke, impatiently dismisses the notion that America is in a real war with a real enemy bent on global domination. "The war on terror is like saying 'the war on poverty,' " he snorts. "It's just a metaphor."

Kerry himself, embracing the pre-9/11 view of fanatic Muslim violence, has repeatedly insisted that the conflict with the jihadis "is primarily an intelligence and law enforcement operation," not a military struggle. "We have to get back to the place we were in the 90s," he told the Times -- back to viewing terrorism the way we view prostitution and gambling: "a nuisance" that "we're never going to end . . . but we're going to reduce."

To Bush the radical, 9/11 shattered the illusion that the Islamofascist terror can be controlled with indictments and criminal lawyers. And it shattered as well the belief that terrorism could be beaten without draining the swamps in which it breeds: the dictatorships and theocracies of the Muslim Middle East. "Terrorists thrive on the support of tyrants and the resentments of oppressed peoples," Bush said last fall. "When tyrants fall, and resentment gives way to hope, men and women in every culture reject the ideologies of terror, and turn to the pursuits of peace."

From that insight springs Bush's campaign to democratize the Middle East, beginning with Afghanistan and Iraq, and his rejection of the old "realist" policy of tolerating oppressive regimes in the name of stability. "This approach brought little stability and much oppression," he has said, "so I have changed this policy."

And Kerry the reactionary would change it back. He argues that "the goal . . . is a stable Iraq, not whether or not there's a full democracy." He told The Washington Post that if elected, he would, in the Post's words, "play down the promotion of democracy as a leading goal." In a Kerry administration there will be no effort to modernize the Middle East with freedom and pluralism. Democracy? "You can't impose it on people," Kerry says.

Bush asserts the right to attack enemies pre-emptively; Kerry emphasizes diplomacy and deterrence. Bush sees the United Nations as obstructionist; Kerry accords it deference and great respect. Bush is prepared to act unilaterally when US interests require it; Kerry cites the "global test" that any American action must meet. In this first presidential election since the Twin Towers fell, Americans have a momentous choice: the reactionary "realism" of a man who says 9/11 didn't change him, or the radical urgency of a man who says 9/11 changed everything.

(Jeff Jacoby is a columnist for The Boston Globe.)

Are Kerry's Discredited Attacks Hurting His Chances?

I love it. In the last week of the campaign...John Kerry, clueless as ever, jumps on a bogus NY Times/CBS story (Bogus CBS story? No way!), and starts attacking the American military as incompetent (his words masked what he really meant...he attempts to blame the president for imaginary explosives, yet he's ultimately attacking the soldiers on the ground who DID the searches themselves. John Kerry attacking the military? No way! Maybe this time, he'll pronounce Ghengis properly.

Because of this bogus story and the attack on our beloved military, plus Kerry's refusal to apologize for using the already discredited story, many pundits think this will really hurt him. The numbers, as I have read them, seem to be trending that way...and it has to be related to this in my opinion. You can't attack the military with a bogus story a week before election day and think you're going to get away with it and come out totally unharmed by your comments that are complete stupidity at best.

Bush leads or is tied with Kerry in every current national head to head poll, and many of the swing states are leaning Bush. Most projection sites have the electoral count going to Bush...and many out there have said that when voters get into the booth, many of them who would vote for Kerry might vote Bush because of this new bogus reporting. We have seen that the voters who have voted already are going more for Bush and the overseas military votes will be a large margin for Bush...also, it seems from the current numbers that those voters who were considered undecided are leaning toward Bush, and many who have voted early have voted for him already. Good news for the President.

It is still scary tho that so many Americans are clueless to the point where a man like John Kerry will say anything to get elected...he'll shamelessly attack the military's efforts in Iraq, he'll attack the president with bogus stories, I'm not sure there's anything Mr. Kerry WOULDN'T do to get elected. That itself is a frightening thought, and the fact that millions of Americans support this guy is even scarier.

Again, CBS is Leading the Way in Pushing Bogus Stories

I will repeat it...It's time we keep up the CBS boycott.
http://www.boycottcbs.com/

First the bogus memos, now new attacks on Bush...while other networks back away from the almost surely bogus story of missing explosives being there when US forces came in- CBS is pushing the story as hard as they were the memo story. You think clueless Dan Rather and his goons would learn, but clearly that's not the case.

The news media that is doing all they can to oust the president needs to feel the pain from the consumer, and CBS is a prime target for the punishment that needs to be handed out.
------------------------
AS REPORTED BY THE MEDIA RESEARCH CENTER: (Oct 27, 2004)

1) Following the same strategy employed when CBS News came under
fire for the forged memos, on Tuesday night, while other news
outlet backtracked from their initial Monday night reporting on
how 377 tons of explosives went missing in Iraq under the watch
of
the U.S. Army, CBS plowed forward. With "Where Are They?" on
screen, Dan Rather teased: "Senator Kerry blasts the President
over those tons of missing explosives. And where are they?"
Later,
Rather declared: "Those missing explosives in Iraq are much more
than a headline or a political wedge issue. They are very real,
very powerful, and possibly in the hands of anti-American
guerrillas or terrorists." CBS acknowledged the political damage
the Monday hyping had done to the Bush campaign, though the
network also revealed that the IAEA had blocked destruction of
the
very stockpile. NBC's Jim Miklaszewski provided a through
rundown
on the possibilities of what happened to the explosives while
Tom
Brokaw was on the defensive about what NBC reported Monday
night,
claiming the Bush campaign mischaracterized their story. CNN's
Jamie McIntyre picked up on the proposition Hussein moved the
explosives before the war. FNC's Brit Hume talked to Dana Lewis,
who was embedded with the first troops on the scene.

2) Assuming facts not in evidence. Tuesday morning on CBS's
Early
Show, Harry Smith argued that the explosives missing in Iraq
have
"been made into bombs that have targeted U.S. troops." But
later,
on the CBS Evening News, David Martin would only go as far as to
relay, over video of an explosion, how "David Kay, who once
headed
the hunt for weapons of mass destruction, says after this
bombing
outside a mosque in Najaf, investigators found traces of the
same
kind of explosives."

Dems Start Lawsuit Nonsense, The Truth about Edwards, and New Reagan Movie

The dems have already started their legal nonsense in Florida.

This is pathetic.

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Check out this site for the truth about John Edwards and the trial lawyers who are so close to him. The guy is a millionaire from what were often bogus lawsuits that hurt doctors, which in turn hurt families and economies...does Edwards care? Unlikely...as is the case with most of these deals- the trial lawyers sue for big bucks, taking the cases worth the most money, and then- they get most of the cash, and the families are often times left with very ltitle if anything at all. And sometimes money is won in these cases on bogus claims, pseudo-science, you name it. It's shameful, and the guy running for vice president is part of it all.

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Check out this new film about Reagan and how he fought the Soviets, ultimately destroying that evil empire.

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

And, finally...

Keith Olberman is a bully who, along with that hack on the same network, Chris Matthews, attacked Michelle Malkin...now, he's obsessed with Bill O'Reilly, often employing a clock at the bottom of the screen that counts down to when they will report on the O'Reilly suit. He also has a weird fund that he's got going on his show and his MSNBC blog to buy tapes no one knows exist (doubtful they do, the woman has totally been trashed in the media as a stalker and a phony.) You think that maybe his obsession comes from the fact that O'Reilly often gets nearly a 4 rating, and Olberman gets less than a 1? His show does nearly as bad as Dennis Miller and McEnroe on CNBC.

Lies About Bush Being Sent Around to Scare College Kids

More lies about President Bush. This time, scare tactics aimed at college students.

The Truth

this flyer is BS. first- raising min wage, bush IS against, but doing so hurts the lowest trained among us. the economy will keep a certain number of low skilled workers, because the fact is- the min wage is sometimes all their skill level is worth. raising min wage puts many of these low skilled workers out on the street, because the overall economy cannot bear the burden withhigher wages that dont match the skill level...so businesses are forced to shed jobs and make others take up the slack and pay them the same amt.

overtime pay, under the rules, would have changed the level at which people were paid overtime, and more people would have been added who would get overtime.

as for pell grants and financial aid- bush has increased funding for both, so the statements above are totally inaccurate. dept of education figures show the number of pell grants awarded the yr bush took office was 3.9 million...and in 2003 the number was 5.1 million, an obvious increase. spending on pell grants in particular was $8 billion in the yr he took office, and now the spending is $12.7 billion- a 60% increase.

the max pell grant aware has risen from $3, 300 to $4, 050 under Bush as well. He has promised he will raise it $1, 000 more for students who take demanding college prep courses in high school.

also, you should look into the official federal definition of "poverty." its not what you think it is. under the current definition, you can own your own house (own, payments finished!) and be considered living in "poverty."

clearly, whoever put this flyer out, is a dishonest outfit who finds it okay to spread disinformation and lies. not too shocking, but still sad.

Drudge Breaks Pre-Election Terror Tape Story

Drudge has a new report that says ABC has received a new terror tape from a man with an American accent...possibly Adam Gadahn, who says there will be a new terror attack that will dwarf Sept 11...that the streets of America will run with blood. ABC has given a copy to the CIA who hasn't been able to authenticate the tape yet, and it seems to be considered of low concern overall.

http://drudgereport.com/abct.htm
http://msnbc.msn.com/id/6345734/

Funny Club For Growth Kerry Flip-Flop Ad

The club for growth has a really funny ad on John Kerry's refusal to commit to a position on nearly any issue. The flip-flop title is accurate, let's just be honest about that.

Anyhow, the ad was made by David Zucker (who made Airplane and The Naked Gun films), and it's honest about Kerry's indecision, but also very funny at the same time.

As the ad says:
“THERE’S NOTHING WRONG WITH A LITTLE INDECISION
. . . AS LONG AS YOUR JOB DOESN’T INVOLVE ANY RESPONSIBILITY.”

CBS Planned on Pushing Another Bogus Bush Attack Story

I think it's time to bring back the CBS boycott. According to new reports, CBS wanted to spring the phony story of missing explosives (missing BEFORE US troops arrived) on Oct 31, in an obvious attempt to sway the election. Let's make CBS feel the pain for their bogus stories and their unamerican activities. Yes, unamerican- lying, distorting the facts, attempting to sway the electorate on phony evidence- that is, indeed, unamerican.

Moveon's Newest Dishonest Attack Ad

Moveon is at it again with new lies from their new ad. They claim that Pat Robertson told Bush there would be casualties in Iraq (no kidding?!), and Bush said 'nah, there won't be any casualties in Iraq.'

Does anyone in their right mind believe the BS that Bush said that no one would die in Iraq? Get real. Even die hard moveon idiots can't buy this absurd claim.

Then, they say that Bush said 'mission accomplished,' tho he never SAID that...the banner, which was placed there by the military (not Bush) read that. The fact is- it was mission accomplished in a manner of speaking. They had accomplished the mission of toppling the regime in Iraq. When on earth did moral boosting for the troops on their amazing ground war become so wrong?

The ad also claims millions of jobs were promised, and there weren't million. If you look at the overall numbers, there was a job gain- the numbers don't take into account home based workers or home based businesses, of which there are millions. Add millions to the 600, 000 figure (of supposed job losses), and you have a job gain. Not to mention- every leader is hopeful that jobs will be created, yet no one can predict the economy like this, and the president has very little to do with the overall economy outside of regulating tax levels, so it wouldn't honestly matter either way.

The ad, like all of moveon's stuff, was nothing but distortion and dishonesty. Not shocking from this radical group, but still just as disgusting.

More on Bogus Explosives Story Touted by Kerry and Mainstream Media

More info on the explosives in Iraq that NBC reports were missing BEFORE US troops even entered the country. Don't worry tho- I guarantee you, Kerry will keep using this as an attack, and claim it's all true, even when he knows it isn't true.

Same thing he did with the Tora Bora claim...even tho Gen. Tommy Franks, who ran that entire campaign said Kerry's grasp on the facts was all messed up, and that none of his claim that Bush "outsourced the job" to afghan warlords was true. US troops were with the Afghans who HAD to be used because they knew the rough terrain...plus, Pakistani forces (tens of thousands of them) guarded the Afghan, Pakistan border, tho Kerry claims no one was guarding the border.

Kerry Tries to Sound Normal Again, and Flubs Again

The biggest question is...Mr. Kerry, is ANYTHING about you real? According to what I have read...Kerry talks about music in the Rolling Stone interview (you remember, last time he was interviewed by that magazine, he dropped the F-bomb and a few other naughty words, I believe...gotta look hip for the younger crowd, I assume?) Anyhow...in this new interview, he says "My favorite album is 'Abbey Road.' I love 'Hey Jude.'"--yet it turns out, Hey Jude isn't on the Abbey Road album. If that's his favorite album, shouldn't he at least know one of their most famous songs isn't even on it? It lends to what I've been saying- everything about John Kerry is bogus, and when he lies to make himself seem more like you and me, he continues to fail miserably.

Jimmy Carter's Living in Lala Land

Neil Cavuto's commentary on the failure-of-a-president, Jimmy Carter, on his show today was hilarious. He DOES come off as a bitter old man, and he's been that way for a long, long time. This guy was probably the worst president we ever had, and he thinks its his place to lecture EVERY American leader ever. He's a joke, and it's nice that Cavuto calls him out for his constant bashing of all his successors.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,136564,00.html

-------------------------------

I am completely convinced...more than I was before. Jimmy Cater is a total nutjob. First, the fact that he gave an interview to the anti-American Guardian newspaper is bad enough, and the fact that he bashed Bush throughout the entire interview is worse...but, his statements are just insane. For example, in the interview, he says this about the Iran crisis (you'll recall, Americans were taken hostage in Iraq on Carter's watch, and he never got them released- that was the work of Pres. Reagan. Plus, Carter started much of the Islamic terrorism stuff when he screwed the shah in Iran and allowed the even more brutal, even more anti-American govt to take control.):

Unwarranted invasion? This coming from Jimmy Carter, the biggest wuss who ever served in the White House. A man who is so perverse in his do-nothing thinking that he probably wouldn't even send American troops if full out world war erupted.

The Palestinian conflict? You mean, Bush refuses to work with international terrorist, Arafat? Yes, Mr. Arafat- let's work to solve this problem. What? You hate all Jews and demand that the state of Israel be destroyed? Well, still...surely you can work on peace with these people, and hide those feelings right? Yes, Mr. Carter- it's a shame we won't negoiate with terrorist leaders for peace deals that soon turn into twisted bribes. You promise to give us this, this, and this, and MAYBE we'll stop blowing you up. Maybe. If you do nothing, we'll still blow you up. Carter, sadly enough, is so backward, he probably doesn't realize a resolution can only come AFTER Arafat is dead and gone.

As for his statement about Iran and how the Islamic world were all against their actions...the guy is not only nuts, he has no memory. The Islamic world was, in general, civilized before the 1980's? They didn't do a thing to help Carter (and he was too bumbling a man to do anything himself), yet his role in allowing the regime change in Iran, and the hostage crisis, hasn't caused the chaos we have today? You have to wonder if this guy is living on the same planet as the rest of us.

Scariest thing about all of this...John Kerry might even be worse than this guy. At least Carter is consistent with his insanity.

The Left's Hypocrisy on Rice

This is how desperate the left in this country is. They're attacking Condi Rice for giving speeches about security issues for the administration. They're saying that she's taking her eye off the ball by doing this, and they're saying that these are federally funded campaign speeches basically. The Bush camp says this is silly, that she's merely going out and talking to Americans about security issues.

Forget that...and remember this. John Kerry and John Edwards are both federally paid senators who have missed scores of votes while campaigning. As mentioned by Cheney in the Veep debate, Edwards' hometown paper calls him "senator gone." A few groups have started petition campaigns to force both senators to resign, because they have refused to do their jobs they're being paid for. They have spent a year campaigning and being paid for jobs they're not even in DC to do...yet the media, for the most part, makes no mention of this, and the left has the audacity to attack Rice for giving a few speeches.

Amazing.

Kerry Camp Refuses to Admit Explosives Truth

By the way, I just realized- the outfit that reported the supposed missing explosives in Iraq? The Bush-hating liberal newspaper, the New York Times. When will people who read this garbage paper realize that they have zero credibility? This is just one more example of their bogus reporting, and just one more example of how liberal they really are. Disgusting...

I'll wait for tomorrow when all the news outlets should report the correction to this story, and report it for JUST AS LONG as they reported it today...I won't hold my breath that many of them will actually report the facts and the truth that these weren't there when we came into Iraq to begin with.

I note to all of you that Joe Lockhart is a partisan liar and cannot be trust either...especially since he was informed of the facts on this issue, yet said this about the matter:

Shameless?!!! You mean, like when someone sees the facts, yet reports the exact opposite (read- LIES) to make political gain?! This guy is outrageous!!

Lockhart has proven that, like his boss, he will say anything, no matter how untrue, to get ahead. Mr. Lockhart, you are a scumbag and a shame to the American system.

NY Times and Kerry Lie about Weapons Cache that was Missing BEFORE US Even Entered Iraq

John Kerry attacked the President again, on the issue of a missing cache of explosives at a base in Iraq...saying that the president was warned, yet refused to secure the site...that this was yet another in the long line of blunders made by the president. It turns out, as I'm sure Kerry was well aware, the stockpile of weapons has been missing over 18 months...when the US troops came into the location, the cache was already missing.
NBC News is reporting this.

In a time of war, John Kerry, is attacking the American troops ultimately, claiming it was their job to protect the supposed cache (it wasn't there to begin with) and that ultimately it was the US military that failed, led by the president. Will the dishonesty ever end with this man? It seems fitting he made this attack on a day that he campaigned with former liar in chief, Bill 'Pants Down' Clinton. When Kerry loses on Nov 2, it is my hope he resigns from his senate seat. We cannot have American leaders who use lies and distortions to attack out current foreign actions. You can disagree, but what this man is doing is unamerican. American leaders have no right to attack others (especially the president) with stuff they know is bogus...they cannot use lies and misstatements against our policy, because such lies hurt all of us.

Kerry's Bogus Claim of Meeting with Entire UN Sec Council Shown to be Bogus

John Kerry claimed that before he made his Iraq war vote...he met with all the members of the UN security coucil. The Washington Times reports that sec council members deny ever meeting with Kerry, and that they have contacted others from the nations UN mission- and no one else has talked to him either. Now the Kerry campaign has backed away from the claim that he met with all the members themselves...they have changed their story to say that Mr. Kerry has private meetings with officials, yet refused to say who these people were or from what nations they were from.

Mr. Kerry is often aided by top secret closed door meetings that no one can know the details of...you'll remember, earlier in the campaign, the senator claimed that he spoke with a number of foreign leaders, and they all said that they wanted him to be elected president (as this article also details)...tho, again, as was the case this time, he refused to name any of those leaders who supposedly supported him, and has never come forward with anymore information- tho, he still stands by the ridiculously bogus claim (especially since he doesn't ever meet with foreign leaders, as was reported at the time of this statement.)

Mr. Kerry might have trouble with such claims, considering that news just came out that a number of world leader's support Bush in the election, including the Japanese PM, John Howard of Australia, Putin of Russia, and others. The only Kerry supporter I'm aware of is Cuba's dictator, Castro.

Kerry, who claims he's all about honesty, is having a tough week when it comes to that. He makes bogus claims of meeting with every sec council member, tho we see this isn't true...he stages a phony goose hunt in Ohio which has been mocked by nearly everyone, and he staged a photo op where he sat around watching his so-called favorite team (the red sox- tho he named his favorite red sox player, and it turns out this "favorite player' never even played for the red sox) and drinking a beer with friends. This isn't a good week for honesty with this campaign, and we're only 8 days out...that says a lot about the candidate who says his presidency will be known by the fact that he always told the truth to the American people.

Ashlee Simspon Makes SAT Night Live History (in a bad way)

That was funny...Bill McCuddy on Fox and Friends showed the clip of Ashlee Simpson (the untalented, bitchy, slutty sister of Jessica) on Saturday Night Live...for her second song, she was standing on stage, and oops- the RECORDED track started, making it clear that she doesn't sing live for one...and two, she had no idea what to do, so she started dancing around like an idiot. The band tried to save her by playing a filler, but she kept dancing like she was insane...then after a moment, walked off the stage, and they were forced to go to a commercial.

Then, at the end of the show, she had the gall to blame the band, saying- my band started playing the wrong song, so I had no idea what to do.

Way to sell out your band by blaming them for your having no vocal talent, and having to lip synch. If you've seen any of her MTV show, you'll understand why she had no problem doing this...the girl (who is 19, I think) is one of the biggest brats you will ever see, selfish as can be, and nearly as dumb as her sister.

It's always fun to see annoying spoiled kids make fools of themselves tho.

John Kerry, a Beer, and Baseball (he's a real guy, they promise!)

Hi. I'm John Kerry. I'm here in Ohio...a "swing state," and I'm sitting on a couch watching the Red Sox (my team! at least when they're doing so well, they're my team! or I'm trying to pander for votes!) Anyhow...look at me. I have a camera crew here, so you all can see me watching good ol' baseball with my friends, like a normal guy. What? Oh this? This is a beer...see me drink my beer, like an average guy. Average Americans like me drink beer while watching baseball (just like all of you! What a coincidence, you say? Nah...I'm just a normal guy, and I feel your pain. Cause I'm average, just like you!)

What? My favorite Red Sox player? Oh, I'm a HUGE fan of the Sox, and my favorite player ever is definitely Eddie Yost! What?! Eddie Yost never played for the Red Sox? Wait a minute...let me call a one of my staffers to see what player is my new favorite (hopefully someone who actually plays for the Sox- remember, my favorite team! Go Sox!)....

Okay. My new favorite player is Manny...wait. I'm not sure how to say his last name, but I'm certain there's a Manny somebody or another playing for Boston. Right? Right?!

Well, thanks for sharing this time with me. Just me, John Kerry- the normal everyday guy, and you...the American voter (especially you shlubs in Ohio and other swing states!) Thanks for sitting with me and sharing my beer and my love for the Boston Yankees...errr, Red Sox. Go team!

HIV Comic Character Nowhere Near Reality

This Real World Judd guy (from season 3 in San Francisco) has written a storyline where the Green Arrow (in the comic) gets a new 17 yr old female sidekick. A 17 yr old girl with HIV. Really stupid idea if you ask me- who in their right mind wants to read comic books about characters with AIDS. He says that it closely mirrors reality- his friend from the MTV show, Pedro, was a gay man who was infected with HIV at the age of 17.

Big problem in his claim that this closely mirrors reality. The girl in the comic is a 17 yr old runaway and former prostitute. So, of course, she'd be a likely candidate for becoming infected, right? Wrong. Studies on prostitutes in major cities have shown very little chance of these women becoming infected. Why? Because their clients are almost always straight males...and straight males have very little risk of becoming infected thru vaginal sex. They have a higher incidence via IV drug use, but the biggest culprit is homosexual activity between two males. This is why Pedro became infected, and it wasn't that shocking...a 17 yr old girl who has intercourse with straight males has little chance of ever becoming infected with the disease, because the straight males act as a barrier.

Buy into the PC B.S. if you want, but HIV is still usually a homosexual disease- the largest percentage of people in this country with the disease are males who have sex with males...some women who have sex with bi-sexual males, and IV drug users. Like I said tho, straight males act as a barrier to the disease, which is why it's not anywhere near an epidemic here in this country. Character in comic books like this are another example of scare tactics aimed at young people, who really have very little chance of becoming infected if they stay away from the biggest risk factor- male to male sex! Very simple...stay away from that risk factor, and your chances of getting the disease are almost nonexistant. These scare tactics are worthless, because it's just that- scare tactics based on what is, in general, disinformation and highly flawed reasoning. MTV uses these tactics all the time, making it out as tho the disease can infect just anyone who does anything sexual, and the chances are real...considering the disease affects less than 1% of the population, this idea is silly. Scarign kids into thinking there's a significant risk is just irresponsible, and it's not reality. Attempting to say that such a character in a comic closely mirrors reality may even be more ridiculous.

Scary Godmother

This 47 min movie aired on Cartoon Network Thursday night (I think it was Thurs)...I watched it late last night (Thurs night/Friday morning) from the DVR. I thought it was really good. It's clearly a movie aimed at a younger audience, but I really enjoyed the CGI animation- it had a really interesting look to it, really bright colors and lighting, the town looked as tho it was part animated one way and part animated a totally different way- I guess you'd have to see it for that to make sense. It was really beautifully animated, and that was cool. The characters- a little girl and her cousin, his friends...along with a scary godmother (a witch who appears out of nowhere to meet the young girl)...a bunch of "monsters" who come to the godmother's Halloween party- the vampire family, a bugaboo, the wolfman who kept eating everything, a skeleton (who sounded like a Jim J Bullock character), and a couple others who rounded out a very nice mix of personas.

Basic story of the little girl who is scared, left in a dark scary house by her older cousin on Halloween night, dared to go inside to appease the monsters in the basement with candy. A scary godmother appears and flies the girl to her magical house with her skeleton roommate (who wears a suti and a top hat), and they throw a Halloween party, and she shows the girls that monsters aren't so bad afterall- they're actually all very nice and friendly. Some of the stuff is completely aimed at a younger audience, while some of the dialogue is actually grown up enough to sit thru and enjoy...even the kid stuff is sophisticated enough to make it all really nice.

I'd really like to see more stuff animated in this style...especially Halloween-related animation which is usually really cool overall.

On another subject (sorta)...I want to see that movie, SAW. I love horror movies, and this one looks interesting, tho from what I read- the plot has major holes in it, and that might not be good. It comes out Oct 29, I think. I also want to see TEAM AMERICA, but never got around to going last week like I planned...and SHAUN OF THE DEAD- tho I'm not even sure if it's still playing.

(Idiot President) Jimmy Carter: Revolutionary War "Unnecessary"/Iraq a "Quagmire"

Probably the WORST of all our former presidents, Jimmy Carter (left wing loon, who wouldn't have agreed that taking on Hitler was a good idea) said the following on MSNBC's Hardball:

The man is so far out there in his no war nonsense, that he believes even the Revolutionary War in which this very nation gained its independence was an "unnecessary war." He might be even crazier than Bill 'Lewinsky' Clinton. The very fact that he called Iraq a "quagmire" was irresponsible enough. No former president has the right to speak out against a current military action during a time of war, if you ask me- you can't have former leaders attacking the current policy when men are women are in harm's way like that. The enemy sees this, and they use it against us...supposed European allies (many who have been indicted in the oil for food scandal) will use statements like this against us as well. The guy is just clueless, and it's quite scary that he used to actually be the president!

(full Hardball transcript here)

Guardian Admits Defeat, Yet Declares Victory

Anti-American British "news"paper, The Guardian has made a bogus claim of "victory" with their ridiculously hateful letter writing campaign where they gave readers addresses to people in Ohio, and had them write these voters to try to sway the election. Due to thousands of returned letters, complaints, and the like- the campaign was halted...tho, they claim it was due to problems with what they call "right-wing hackers" (whatever that means!)

This was a stupid idea from the start, and like many voters in Ohio have said:

BUTT OUT BRITS.

Kerry Camp- Make Kerry Look More Real with Phony Activities?!

Why does ANYONE do this? John Kerry pandering by going hunting, in OHIO of all places...is just absurd, and no reasonable person will see this without laughing at his desperate attempt for votes. The country wants a REAL person, not someone who sets up bogus hunting trips thru his campaign...this isn't theatre, it's real life- something Kerry clearly is unaware of.

Why on earth did Mike McCurry come out and admit this was a staged event (as if we didn't know anyhow), and talk about how Mr. Kerry is showing he's a real person by doing this, and "talking about his faith" and "his beloved Red Sox."

First off- how on earth doesd this admittedly staged event show Kerry to be a real person? Secondly, even tho the Red Sox made a big comeback, and it's a great story for all their fans- why did McCurry mention Kerry's "beloved Red Sox," when it was shown that Kerry was phony even about his love of the Red Sox as well (he said his favorite sox player was Edddie Yost- who never even played for the Red Sox, plus he misnamed a couple of other players he supposedly loves as well)...his phony love for the hometown team shows how FAKE he is, not that he's a real person. Not even to mention the fact that when he threw the first pitch at a Sox game in July, he was booed!

Then, McCurry says Kerry will talk about his faith- tho he's come under attack from major catholics for his stance on abortion (which is forbidden by the church, yet Kerry supports), plus, his stance on gay marriage- he's against it, but is for civil unions. Plus, you'll recall Kerry said odd things about religion in the debates. He said that with abortion- it would be wrong for him to legislate with his faith, tho right before that he said his faith affects everything he does, and that he bases his environmental policy on his faith (it's okay to base your decisions on the enivornment and the economy on your faith, but wrong to do so in general, as you claim. That ALMOST makes sense!)

Three activities where we know Kerry is completely phony, yet this is what McCurry stages to show that he's a real person? I'm not sure who is crazier- Kerry or his staff!

O'Reilly Accuser Has over $100, 000 in Debt

I told you when this first started- this woman is a liar, and she wanted money. Everyday, a new story comes out about her being in bad debt and doing bizarre things...now, drudge has a story saying she's in big time debt (as you can see below), and the evidence is mounting against her.

You think a woman making $93, 000 a yr for Fox News would have more sense than this...guess not.

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
XXXXX DRUDGE REPORT XXXXX THU OCT 21, 2004 17:23:09 ET XXXXX

O'REILLY ACCUSER DEEP IN DEBT

**Exclusive**

The DRUDGE REPORT has obtained O'Reilly accuser Andrea Mackris' financial records which show a combined debt of nearly $100,000!

FOXNEWS producer Andrea Mackris, who filed a multimillion dollar sexual harassment suit against top talker O'Reilly earlier this month, has I.O.U's scatted throughout the financial world, records show.

Mackris was making $93K a year when she returned to FOXNEWS in 2004 [she earned $69,088 in 2003], but records dated October 18 show she holds more than $37k in credit card debt, and $62k in student loans.

"It appears Ms. Mackris was living way beyond her means," a source close to the situation told DRUDGE late Thursday. "She's up to her eyeballs in debt."

A spokeswoman for Mackris' attorneys, Morelli & Associates, said the firm was unaware of their client's heavy load and laughed off any suggestion her financial burden was a motivation for a cash demand from FOX.

Mackris, 33, and her attorney have been ordered to appear for a hearing in New York State Supreme Court next week to divulge whether sex phone tapes exist and "show cause" why they should not be opened to examination by lawyers for O'Reilly and FOXNEWS.

Developing...

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Also...
President Bush has increased science funding for many national organizations by 44%, he has increased funding for research into nano-technology, and he's the first president to make federal funds available for embryonic stem cell research, yet today John Kerry said Bush is an ideologue who is hindering science and actually taking science backward instead of forward.

You have to wonder if there's anything this man won't say, no matter how untrue, to get your vote.

Halloween Banned- Political Correctness Gone Insane

I wrote about the school official who refused to allow a PA high school under her control to have their marching band play for the President on a campaign stop...saying that if she allowed the band to play- it would be too "partisan" and that it was wrong. I wrote her a nice e mail telling her how bad a decision I thought she made, and that saying it would be partisan to play for the leader of our nation was absurd...she wrote me back saying she was sorry I didn't agree, and that anytime outside of the campaign, she would be happy to have the president come and have the band play for him (he's not going to come to PA for no reason, and he surely wouldn't come to this particular school after this, so she basically robbed the kids of a once in a lifetime chance, in my opinion.) Now, I think it's time to write the superintendent of this school district in Washington state...where they have banned Halloween- saying that witches costumes and such would be disrespectful to local wiccans.

If that isn't crazy, nothing is. Political correctness gone mad, of course, and people that do this drive me up the wall...they're too uptight, too whiny, and they make everyone's life miserable.

School children are banned from taking part in any Halloween parties, parades, etc...we don't wanna offend anybody. BOO HOO.

http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=184701&page=1

Bush (jibjab) Pics

Stop Moore from Swaying Electorate

Socialist, propaganda filmmaker, Michael Moore is at it again. He is attempting to use his lies to sway the upcoming election by offering free rentals of his thouroughly refuted piece of FICTION, Fahrenheit 911 at select video stores around the country.

If a video store in your area is taking part and offering the rental for free- go and get a copy and tell all of your friends to get a copy, that way all the videos will be gone, and we can assure that some uninformed voters won't see the film and buy into the distortions and lies. Mr. Moore has no right to try to sway the election like this, and as Americans, we should do everything in our power to stop him.

http://moorewatch.com/index.php/weblog/fahrenheit_for_free/

John Kerry Attacks Cheney (a heart patient) For Getting Needed Flu Shot

Americans, wake up!!! This man wants to be president!!!

John Kerry is now attacking Dick Cheney (who has a bad heart) for getting a flu shot!!! Kerry says this is wrong, and claims that it's do as we say, not as we do- but, Cheney never said he wasn't going to get a flu vaccine, and the president said that only those who are in certain categories should get it now (people like HEART PATIENTS like DICK CHENEY.)

One more piece of evidence that John Kerry and his lowdown campaign will do and say ANYTHING to get your vote.

This is just awful, and I am sick of it. There is no doubt in my mind- John Kerry is NOT a good person, and a man who would use attacks like these is not fit for any public office, let alone the highest office.

Also, a note to all Americans- if you fit into the category of needing a flu shot (if you're a heart patient, for example), do NOT get a flu shot. John Kerry won't allow the Vice President to get one, why would he allow you to get one? Do you not think he would be attacking everyone of you who need the shot if it was a political gain?

----------------------------
Kerry team slams reports VP Cheney had a flu shot
Wed Oct 20 2004 20:02:09 ET

Senator John Kerry's presidential campaign Wednesday slammed Vice President Dick Cheney, a heart patient, over reports he had a flu shot, despite a shortage of the vaccine.

The campaign complained that Treasury Secretary John Snow and Senate Majority leader Bill Frist also had jabs, despite Bush's advice that the young and healthy did not need to get an injection.

"Once again, the Bush administration proves that it is the 'do as we say, not as we do' White House," the campaign said in a statement issued in Pittsburgh where Kerry was campaigning.

"The very week that (health) secretary (Tommy) Thompson is telling Americans to keep calm, Dick Cheney, John Snow and Bill Frist are getting flu shots."

"It is unfortunate that the Bush administration failed to do the work necessary to ensure that all Americans, including those most at risk, had been able to get shots as well."

Cheney would fit into the government's definition of those most vulnerable to a looming influenza epidemic as he has a long history of heart disease.

Bush last week suggested in the final presidential debate that the young and healthy forgo the annual shot amid a shortage of vaccine that Kerry has blamed on the president's management of the health system.

END
----------------------------

Heinz-Kerry Offers Bogus Apology

It seems the Kerry campaign staff has forced Heinz into apologizing for her stupid comments. Truth be told, this is most likely a statement from the campaign, and Teresa probably had nothing to do with it, nor any word in what was said in the statement.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
To: National Desk, Political Reporter

Contact: Sarah Gegenheimer of Kerry Edwards 2004, 202-464-2800

PITTSBURGH, Oct. 20 /U.S. Newswire/ -- Teresa Heinz Kerry released the following statement today:

"I had forgotten that Mrs. Bush had worked as a school teacher and librarian, and there couldn't be a more important job than teaching our children. As someone who has been both a full time mom and full time in workforce, I know we all have valuable experiences that shape who we are. I appreciate and honor Mrs. Bush's service to the country as First Lady, and am sincerely sorry I had not remembered her important work in the past."

---------------

You will notice that the statement, supposedly from Heinz-Kerry, (anyone else find it creepy she uses her deceased husband's last name?) says that she forgot Mrs. Bush was a librarian and a teacher (convenient memory loss, huh?), and she throws in the part about a full time mom...I suppose she forgot Mrs. Bush is a mother as well, and wanted to make it up to mothers everywhere who were today told they didn't have "real jobs" in raising children.

Hopefully American women will remember this statement on election day, and take into mind the fact that her husband surely can't feel much different- he DID marry her afterall, they have to be like-minded people (somewhat)...

Flashback: Kerry's UN Obsession in the 90's

This is very frightening. The words of John Kerry and defending the United States, and his obsession with the United Nations. Kerry might claim that no nation or body holds a veto in regards to defending this nation, but his record shows the opposite, and his words show that he is no being honest when he says this.

You will recall that in the debate, Kerry said that the US must meet a "global test" in which we could justify our actions to the world. Those were his words, and he cannot deny them today. The truth is, come November 2, you have two very different men to choose from...a man who will demand that the US justify our actions to the world, a man who voted against the first gulf war, when Hussein actually invaded a neighboring country, or a man who has proven he will do anything he can to make this country safe, and will face any foe that might pose a threat...no permission needed from ANYONE besides the people of this country. If John Kerry were to be elected, this is what we would be in for...a very dangerous situation where we would have to prove to rogue nations across the globe that what we're doing is justified...that isn't just dangerous, it's insane, and with John Kerry- this is a certainty.

Heinz-Kerry Attacks First Lady

John Kerry's wife (who lied about calling republicans "unamerican," and when asked about this by a reporter- she told the man to "shove it," called those who differ from her husband's views idiots, called those who are against her husband "scumbags", is now coming out and attacking Laura Bush, saying that she doesn't think Mrs. Bush has ever had a real job. Heinz-Kerry, a billionaire thanks to the fortunes left to her from her FORMER HUSBAND (noting, she didn't earn her money) said the following about the first lady in an interview with USA Today:

You decide if this is the woman you want as first lady. I'm guessing very few people would say 'yes, this is a woman I want in the White House.' Think about that come Nov 2.

Rock The Vote Head, Jehmu Green, is a Liar

Jehmu Greene is a liar. The executive director of Rock The Vote, one of the most dishonest voting groups around, a group that claims to be nonpartisan, yet their website as a basic attack on the Bush administration and a list of democratic talking points, is going around STILL claiming teh draft hoax is real, and that it is NOT a myth, it is not untrue...it's all very true. The recent vote in congress that killed the bill brought by democrat (YES, DEMOCRAT) Charlie Rangell, by a vote of 402-2...she claims that it was only brought to vote because it IS real (she claimed this nonsense on MSNBC Tuesday night), and that the vote was bogus and they only voted on it to make sure no serious discussion could take place regarding it (yes, genius...no serious discussing, since it's a scare tactic being used by the left, and it's not one bit serious, being that it's phony.)

I have noticed on the rockthevote.com site that the phony draft card on their front page (funny, their very front page kills the claim of non-partisanship) DID have the signature of Donald Rumsfeld, but I take it pressure from the web forced them to change it and now it shows the signature of Charlie Rangell (which doesn't make sense, considering he voted against the bill, even tho he originally brought it up with inaccurate military stats, claiming that blacks make up a disproportionate number of front line personnel...they don't, and DOD numbers proved him wrong.)

I was disusted by Greene's irresponsible, irrational, and dishonest remarks on MSNBC, and I think she's scummy for doing what she's doing. Instead of helping young people take part in the election process, she is only tarnishing the repuation of an entire age group that she claims to want to help. She makes all young people look silly when so many young people are out there speaking out, parroting her draft issue nonsense, as if it were a real issue and a true possibility, even tho it's been completely refuted.

proving that Greene is a liar, here is part of an Oct 14, 2004 editorial she wrote:

As I mentioned, Rangel claimed that blacks were serving on the front lines in disproportionate numbers in comparison to the overall US population...but, dept. of defense numbers proved his assertion false (they showed that a larger percentage of blacks overall were in the military compared to the civilian population, but that a great percentage of these military men and women were in service positions and nowhere near the front lines), and as the head of a large voter group, she has to know this, yet chooses to ignore the facts and insert lies in her editorials.

She should be ashamed of herself, but as I always say- scumbags usually have no shame, so it's unlikely this will be the case.

Thankfully, I, and anyone else online who chooses to expose her lies, can make it known that she is, indeed, a liar, and that she's shameful in her actions as part of rock the vote.

more on this issue (1)(2)(3)