Why does Monica Lewinsky need a publicist?! That's juat absurd.
Why is Clinton changing his story of some events, and contradicting himself in his new memoir that is over 900 pages!!
Who in their right mind writes a 900 page memoir? Who is so in love with themselves? Who in their right mind takes $10-12 million in advance for such a book the highy liberal NY Times calls "sloppy, self-indulgent and often eye-crossingly dull"?
Why are some people so amazed by Clinton, as if he could do no wrong?
Why do some people say "when Clinton lied no one died," and claim that George Bush lied about anything, tho there's not one shred of evidence to suggest such a thing? Why is that these same people that say that have no answer when they realize Clinton had the same exact policy as Bush and said the same exact things about WMD- the same thing the UN said (Hussein never fully complied and didn't destroy all banned weapons)? Why can't they be honest...if they claim Bush lied and people died, why don't they say the same thing about Clinton?
Why are some people so clueless as to the reality that Clinton didn't "just like about sex," and that he lied to law enforcement, a grand jury, Congress, his aides, the American people- and it wasn't about sex, it was about a sexual harassment lawsuit with Paula Jones. You will remember, numerous women have come forward telling stories of Clinton sexually harassing them, groping them, even allegations of rape. A man who lied with a straight face to the American public in national tv time and time again- how can anyone with any sense trust that he didn't commit these various illegal acts with numerous women? He admits to having relations with Monica (don't ask him about it, or he'll explode like he did in a recent interview), so we have to assume that there's a good chance that Jones was telling the truth, as were the various other women. Why will some people not admit as much?
From everything I have seen the last week or so- it seems dems are ready to tow the party line, kneel down, and kiss the hand of the great Mr. Clinton...republicans and many independents seem to have some sense on the issue, and they realize that Clinton was neither a good president nor a good man.
Posted by Josh at June 22, 2004 06:42 AM | TrackBackI must take exception to your statement that "there's not one shred of evidence to suggest such a thing", in re George Bush's lies about the need for a war in Iraq.
May I direct you to the following web site of the US House of Representatives and their report of not one but 237 separate "misrepresentations" (read LIES) from George Bush and his stooges:
www.house.gov/reform/min/features/iraq_on_the_record
Please take the time to read the report thoroughly. You appear to be somewhat of a knee jerk conservative that will deny the truth even when presented with the facts.
lol. nice source of the so called "lies" from bush. henry waxman, democrat from california. golly, i wonder if this is a reliable source on the truth of the matter.
where could we find a bipartisan record of the truth...hmm. wait, maybe we could go to the official 9/11 committee report and their details on iraq- a bipartisan group that said there were no lies, no misrepresentations, etc. from prs. bush. they even said there was no pressure from the bush white house to get the cia to say that iraq had wmd. none whatsoever. so, a bipartisan group says there were no lies, but your "proof" is a liberal rep. from california who despises bush who has his little site that claims 237 lies?
hilarious!
Posted by: Josh Bozeman at August 20, 2004 06:26 PM